Razer has made a habit of catching us off guard -- breaking the mold as an accessory manufacturer by building laptops, prototype game handhelds and controller-toting tablets. Their Blade laptop cut through our expectations as well, featuring a beautiful aluminum shell and one of the thinnest profiles of any gaming rig on the market. It had some serious flaws, though: it was underpowered, had minor build issues and simply fell short in the audio department. Its maker, apparently, wasn't deterred: mere months after the original Blade's own debut, Razer is now introducing a successor.

Most of the changes are internal: this model swaps out the original's Sandy Bridge CPU and last-generation NVIDIA graphics for a newly announced 2.2GHz Intel Core i7-3632QM processor and a Kepler-based GeForce GTX 660M GPU. It caught our interest -- Razer had previously insisted its first laptop wasn't built just for power, but for a premium experience. Now, the firm seems to be focusing on both (now that's a premium experience we can get behind). So, is this upgrade enough to make up for the OG version's shortcomings? Read on to find out.Gallery: Razer Blade review (late 2012)



Continue reading Razer Blade review (late 2012)

Filed under: Gaming, Laptops

Razer Blade review (late 2012) originally appeared on Engadget on Sun, 30 Sep 2012 03:01:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

<h6 style="clear: both; padding: tease.gifx 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6>Permalink | | Email this | Comments
[img]http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/o1VyMttSkS_aRqoUy9tT-c6to0c/0/di[/img]</img>

[img]http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/o1VyMttSkS_aRqoUy9tT-c6to0c/1/di[/img]</img>


[img]http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/weblogsinc/engadget?i=2LrLxE70QVI:Ld0yATYST_Q:wF9xT3WuBAs[/img]</img> [img]http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/weblogsinc/engadget?i=2LrLxE70QVI:Ld0yATYST_Q:V_sGLiPBpWU[/img]</img> [img]http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/weblogsinc/engadget?i=2LrLxE70QVI:Ld0yATYST_Q:-BTjWOF_DHI[/img]</img> [img]http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/weblogsinc/engadget?d=qj6IDK7rITs[/img]</img>
[img]http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/weblogsinc/engadget/~4/2LrLxE70QVI[/img]

View the full article

View the full article